So I am now going to step up to 4 tabling the $50 buy-in tables and whilst I expect the opposition to be tougher I think that with the right seat selection there are still enough gamblers passing through to feed the regulars.
What I have noticed from datamining is there are not too many full ring tables going once I get above this level. If I do get to making the $2k I may need to call it a day and start all over again on the 6max tables, as there are always lots of 6max tables going.
As you can see in the PT charts below it took almost 8,000 hands to get there from my $10 starting point and at 15BB/100 I certainly run good. The trend is also pretty good in the chart, no big downswings yet.
The table of all people with at least 2,500 hands also puts me at the top of the pile in terms of BB/100 and I don't think I am that good. Maybe I ran good? I just don't know and 8k hands is such a small sample anyway.
What is most surprising about this table is that there is only 1 losing player over 2,500 hands. There is so much volume of losing players at the small buy-in on Laddies that it is very difficult for a half decent player to lose in the long-run.
Whilst I haven't got in 5k hands this month I think the chances are that I will leave the cash games and get some SNGs in for the rest of the month. Not sure how this will affect my game by taking a break and then coming straight back into the $50 buy-ins?
I Would love to be stepping up to the $20 SNGs by Feb but this is unlikely to happen given my current ROI (about 17%). I'm moving my PokerRoom roll over to Parbet as PR have been treating players very poor recently. Parbet also have a 200MPP freeroll coming up that could have lots of value. I need to get 67 SNGs in there by the 2nd Feb.
FBF
No comments:
Post a Comment